Communities.govHouseholder feesPlanning feesGrey BeltNorthstowe and Langley Sutton ColdfieldWorcestershire ParkwayLiverpool Central DocksAngela RaynerMiller-Mead testS173(1)(b)TCPA 1990S171A(1)PilkingtonRachel ReevesLPADLUHCTime limitsLevelling up and Regeneration Act 2023Town and Country Planning Act 19904 year ruleLURAPermiClass MAC4House of Multiple OccupationHMOAppealLondon Borough of LambethLambethPlanning and Compulsory Purchase ActMaterial considerationsStrongly4-year rulePlanning BillLevelling UpLevelling Up and Regeneration BillNorbitonRBKuTSILTall BuildingsPTALDensityHouseSection 55Post 1948Two storey extensionsClass F2Class F1Class EPurpose built flatsResidentialPart 20Class C3Two-storey upwardsNew permitted development rightThe Town and Country Planning (Permitted DevelopmChief PlannerPlanning permissionPD Rights for roof extensionsPandemicCovid-19CoronavirusRobert JenrickSecretary of State for Housing, Communities and LoBuilding, Better, Building Beautiful CommissionNational Design Mode CodeEbenezer HowardBuilding better, building beautiful reportFast track for beautyLiving with beautyChartered MembershipThomas TinelSouthwarkJVYIMBYAgricultural buildingsCurtilageClass PAMartin GoodallHousing SecretaryNational Design GuideRooflightsChepstow CrescentNotting HillWest BromptonExtensionRoof extensionMansardBarons CourtTootingTown Country Planning ActImmunityCertificate of LawfulnessWindowsUPVCMansfield Conservation AreaConstruction of new dwellingsUpwards extensionsCreation of dwellingsClass B1aCreation of Offices on the high streetTemporary change of useLarger Home ExtensionsLondon Borough of Hammersmith and FulhamLondon Borough of HarrowLondon Borough of HillingdonLondon Borough of CamdenLondon Borough of EalingPinner Hill EstatePinnerLarge housing sitesInfrastructureParish councilsOxford - Cambridge growth corridorPlanning ReformPublic phone boxesLocal Authority Area Master PlannerLAMPBPFJohn AcresRoyal Town Planning InstituteLDCLocal Development CompanyFinancial TimesOliver LetwinSir Oliver LetwinBudget 2018Homes EnglandLand value captureHousing needGalliford TryBritish Property FederationPPGPlanning Practice GuidanceSajid JavidBMFBuildings Merchants' Federation'Upward extensionsLocal Planning AuthorityListed Building Enforcement AppealEnforcementInquiriesAppealsWritten RepresentationsHearingsJctphoto.comRobert Dye ArchitectsTeamworkBaufritzGrand DesignsLarger homes extensionsLondon Borough of Richmond upon ThamesCondition removalSection 73S73Historic environmentTransaction chargesThird-party payment1AppReDirectPlanning PortalThe Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017Kensal RiseC3HomesSui GenerisNorth KensingtonChapter RoadFlatsLB IslingtonPlanning InspectorateExamination in PublicCity PlanSite Specific Allocations DocumentDevelopment Management Policies DocumentDesign or Residential ExtensionsUrban Design GuideDevelopment Plan DocumentShop Front Planning GuidanceCore Planning StrategyKingston-upon-ThamesLocal Plan Partial ReviewConsolidated PlanSection 106Planning ObligationsFinsbury Local PlanSite AllocationsLocal Plan ReviewSPDResidential Extension GuidelinesSecretary of StateUDPDevelopment PlanHillingdonRevised Local PlanLocal Development SchemeDevelopment Management Local PlanPlanning Guidance Supplementary Planning DocumentHammersmithEaling Local Development SchemeCore Strategy DPDUnitary Development PlanCamden Development PoliciesCamden Planning GuidanceBrent Design GuideLocal PlanLondon Borough of BrentBarnet Local PlanDevelopment Plan DocumentsSupplementary Planning DocumentsDevelopment Management PoliciesCore StrategyBarnet London BoroughHerzog & de MeuronRegenerationFulhamHammersmith and FulhamChelsea FCJCALocal Planning AuthoritiesBuilding Regulations and Fire SafetyHackittGrenfellLondon BoroughsPre-CommencementConditionsDominic RaabMertonBarnetWandsworthHarrowEalingKensington and ChelseaDecisions, Decisions, DecisionsTCPALaintonChurchill Retirement LivingPINSLocal PlansGreen BeltViability AssessmentConsultationS106Developers' ContributionsViabilityClaire KoberLondon Borough of HaringeyHaringey Development VehicleCompulsory Purchase OrdersLabourEnglish Sovereign Land TrustConservation AreasGarden grabbingSteve QuartermainNational Planning Policy FrameworkIslingtonLawful Development CertificateChange of UsePlanning applicationsFeesTheresa MayMHCLGBuilding SocietyNationwideHBAThe House Builders AssociationNFBNational Federation of BuildingsConservatives2018NPPFNick RaynsfordTown and Country Planning AssociationCrossrailCrossrail2Community Infrastructure LevyGeneral Permitted Development OrderPhilip HammondMayorLondon MayorVauxhall Nine ElmsCity Fringe / Tech CityKing’s CrossEustonTottenham Court RoadVictoriaPaddingtonBrent Cross / CricklewoodColindale / Burnt OakHarrow and WealdstonePark RoyalOld OakGreat West Corridor, Kensal CanalsideWest KensingtonEarls CourtWhite CitySouthallHayesHeathrowOpportunity areasCity MetricNew StatesmanLondon PlanZaha HadidHouse Me LondonWorld Town Planning DayNational Infrastructure FundCILClean Air FundCPOLandStephen WilkinsonBudget 2017Sadiq KhanSMEMilton KeynesOxfordCambridgeHousingRTPIBudgetAffordable housingSocial housingEIAPlanningGina MillerBrexitJoe Wright ArchitectsCricklewoodWillesden JunctionDollis HillOutriggersDormer RoofsClass BClass AHome extensionsPermitted DevelopmentLB BrentNorth LondonBasementsChelseaKensingtonKentish TownStorageLight industrialChiswickHounslowAlpertonWembleyBrentTwickenhamMortlakeKewHampton WickHamptonRichmondCamdenWestminsterRoyal Borough of Kensington and ChelseaBarkerShelterGuardianLondonEmpty homesGeneral Permitted Development Order 2015West LondonRetail to ResidentialRetailPrior ApprovalPrior NotificationRoyal Borough of Kingston upon ThamesKingstonOffices to ResidentialOfficesOfficeArticle 4
TAGS

Negotiated Pre-Commencement Conditions: Welcome news

The Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017

Pre-commencement planning conditions and the delays caused to project programmes have always plagued the UK planning system and its ability to encourage development. 

As stated by Ashfords LLP:

On 1 October 2018 the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017 (Commencement No 5) Regulations 2018 will trigger section 14 of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017, specifically subsections 14(1), (3) and (4). This in turn will implement s100ZA (4) to (13) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

The government has now confirmed decision makers cannot grant planning permission containing a pre-commencement condition unless the applicant has either agreed to the terms of the condition or hasn’t responded within ten working days.

This is a summary of how it would work procedurally for the applicant. 

The applicant receives notice from the LPA seeking to impose a pre-commencement condition. 

- They can provide a written agreement and the LPA may grant planning permission subject to that pre-commencement condition, or

- They can provide comments within the time limit, in which case that condition cannot be imposed, or 

- They can choose not to respond in which case the LPA may grant planning permission subject to that pre-commencement condition, or 

- They can indicate that they do not agree to the terms of the proposed condition, in which case the LPA may either:

i. grant planning permission without the pre-commencement condition,

ii. seek written agreement to an alternative pre-commencement condition, or

iii. refuse to grant permission (if it considers that the disputed pre-commencement condition is necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms).

What options are available to an owner who does not wish to comply with a condition?

- They can apply for removal or discharge of some or all of the conditions to the LPA. However, whatever the outcome of this application, the original permission will continue to exist. In addition, the decision notice for the grant of planning permission should also repeat the relevant conditions from the original permission, unless they have already been discharged. The local planning authority has also the right to impose new conditions – provided the conditions do not materially alter the development that was subject to the original permission and are conditions which could have been imposed on the earlier planning permission.

- They can appeal the decision of the LPA to grant planning permission subject to conditions, to the Secretary of State within 12 weeks of the date on the decision notice for householder planning applications or 6 months for other planning decision types.

This is positive especially for the bigger schemes but from a legal point of view pre-commencement conditions may continue to be a headache for planners and developers. 

First, the use of the procedure seems to be ruled out for outline planning permissions as in Section 100ZA(8) Town and Country Planning Act 1990, introduced by section 14(1) of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017, ‘pre-commencement condition’ is defined as:

“a condition imposed on a grant of planning permission (other than a grant of outline planning permission within the meaning of section 92) which must be complied with—

 (a) before any building or other operation comprised in the development is begun, or

 (b) where the development consists of a material change in the use of any buildings or other land, before the change of use is begun.”

There are further issues:

What if an applicant resists a requested pre-commencement condition? It is to be hoped that a compromise will be found but, if not, ultimately the decision maker’s only option may be refusal of the application.

What if a decision maker fails to follow the procedure and issues a permission with an unwelcome pre-commencement condition? The applicant can challenge the permission but this will cost money and time. 

It is easy to see Local Planning Authorities struggle with the legislation and not adapting easily. Applicants not aware of this procedure may still accept pre-commencement conditions as a fait a complis. It is always worth speaking to your advisor to understand what options you have. 

The new legsilation will be come into force 1st October 2018. 



 

This product has been added to your cart

CHECKOUT